School Nutrition Association of Wisconsin
 Location:  Home » Books » Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment    

Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment

Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent ImpairmentAuthor: American Medical Association
Creator: Robert Rondinelli
Publisher: American Medical Association Press
Category: Book

List Price: $189.00
Buy New: $144.85
as of 9/8/2010 19:20 CDT details
You Save: $44.15 (23%)

In Stock


New (21) Used (10) from $115.99

Seller: oddesseyy
Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars 7 reviews
Sales Rank: 160,372

Media: Hardcover
Edition: 6
Pages: 634
Number Of Items: 1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 3.9
Dimensions (in): 11.1 x 8.6 x 1.4

ISBN: 1579478883
Dewey Decimal Number: 614.1
EAN: 9781579478889
ASIN: 1579478883

Publication Date: December 15, 2007
Shipping: Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days

Similar Items:


Editorial Reviews:

Product Description
Updated and enhanced: Guides sixth offers the most current guidelines for correct impairment evaluation

The newly revised Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, sixth edition, from the American Medical Association, emphasizes the fundamental skills physicians need to evaluate and communicate patient impairments.

Standardized methodology is applied to each chapter to enhance the relevancy of impairment ratings, improve internal consistency and promote ease of application to the rating process. This ordered method enables busy physicians to become proficient with the ratings for multiple organ systems and anticipate how each chapter is organized and assimilates information.

The sixth edition applies both terminology from and an analytical framework based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), to generate five impairment classes which permit the rating of the patient from no impairment to most severe. A diagnosis-based grid has been developed for each organ system. The grid arranges commonly used ICD-9 diagnoses within the five classes of impairment severity, according to the consensus-based dominant criterion.

Functionally based histories, physical findings and broadly accepted objective clinical test results are integrated where applicable to help physicians determine the grade within the impairment class. The result is a decision that is both transparent and reproducible.

Using the latest evidence in diagnosis and clinical tests, the new sixth edition offers the following key features:

-Standardized approach across organ systems and chapters
-Expanded use of diagnostic approach to help physicians consider relevant clinical tests and patient outcomes in performing the rating
-Required clinical information needed to rate a given condition
-Clear step-by-step grading instructions in each chapter to promote consistent scoring of impairment ratings and to improve physician consistency
-Simplified methodology presented between chapters
-Contemporary, evidence-based concepts and terminology of disablement from the ICF
-The latest scientific research and evolving medical opinion provided by nationally and internationally recognized experts
-More comprehensive and expanded diagnostic approach
-Transparent process to allow the evaluator to document functional assessment, clinical tests and physical findings
-Uniform grids to help physicians calculate impairment ratings


Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 7



5 out of 5 stars A Must For Disability Examiners   December 22, 2008
John V. Ioia (Kingston, NY)
0 out of 1 found this review helpful

The title says it all. This is the requirement for many insurers in IMEs. They are not accepting the earlier editions as being authoritative. Some sections have been expanded but it's pretty much same-old, same old...


4 out of 5 stars And now, the fireworks   April 13, 2008
KA Ward (Great Falls MT USA)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful

As a physiatrist performing an average of one impairment rating a day, the 6th Edition came abruptly as a required tool. It took about 20 ratings to get into the swing of things. The big problem is the simple story of supply and reimbursement that US doctors face: It takes about twice as long to do a rating with the 6th edition in the common chapters (15,16, 17: arm, leg, spine/pelvis).
Like everything else that insurance pays for, us greedy doctor types are working more and getting paid less.

The book, in my estimation, is fairer, with ratings consistently decreased by about 40%.




4 out of 5 stars More Details   May 13, 2009
Jeffrey M. Kagan, MD (Connecticut USA)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful

This new version makes rating disability impairment much more difficult that the prior editions. For instance, in the past to rate for injuries to the spine you merely looked at one table. Now you have to look as several different tables to rate the contributing value of the History, Physical, Functional tests, Images and Pain to come up with a composite score. Jeffrey M. Kagan, MD


3 out of 5 stars Better in some respects   December 14, 2009
Austin Reader
1 out of 1 found this review helpful

This editions provides a much better analysis of RSD/CRPS than either the 4th or 5th editions. It also, for the first time, contains a methodolgy for rating mental impairment and translating it into ordinal scales. Unfortunately it contains so many errors that a huge supplement had to be issued (and is available for free on the AMA website). These are not just typographical errors but are errors of substance.

The 3rd edition of the Guides Casebook is also a must have.



3 out of 5 stars AMA - GEPI, 6th Edition   April 6, 2008
Dan Finewood (San Francisco, CA)
The sixth edition of "The Guides" offers a slimmed-down version of the Fifth Edition, with sleaker looking tables and example boxes. On first glance, the differences are subtle. Certain deficiencies, such as using congenital disease in the examples, were propagated from the Fifth Edition.

Showing reviews 1-5 of 7



Copyright © 2009 School Nutrition Association of Wisconsin
disability  handicap  industrial disease  occupational medicine  rating impairment